From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Richardson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Jul 17, 2018
Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-049-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Jul. 17, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-049-O-BP

07-17-2018

RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON, TDCJ No. 01005689, Petitioner, v. WARDEN RICHARDSON, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After making an independent review of the pleadings, files, and records in this case, of the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and of Petitioner's objections thereto, I am of the opinion that the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and reasons for dismissal set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation are correct and they are hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the Findings of the Court.

This habeas action is being dismissed for want of prosecution due to Petitioner's failure to comply with the Court's order to submit a certified inmate trust account statement. The certified trust account statement is necessary for the Court to determine whether Petitioner is eligible to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. See Miscellaneous Order No. 6, Rule 2 § (a)(4) (N.D. Tex. May 5, 2005) (requiring review of certified inmate trust account statement to determine whether habeas petitioner qualifies for in forma pauperis status).

For the foregoing reasons, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for want of prosecution. See Summers v. State of Texas, No. 1:07-cv-377, 2007 WL 3231660 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 31 2007) (dismissing habeas action for Petitioner's failure to submit a certified trust account statement as ordered). Petitioner may reopen the case by filing a motion to reopen and a certified inmate trust account statement within 30 days of the date of this order. Petitioner is cautioned that there is a one-year statute of limitations applicable to the filing of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).

SO ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2018.

/s/ _________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Richardson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Jul 17, 2018
Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-049-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Jul. 17, 2018)
Case details for

Johnson v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON, TDCJ No. 01005689, Petitioner, v. WARDEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 17, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:18-cv-049-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Jul. 17, 2018)