From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Prime Auto Direct

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 30, 2014
NO. 01-14-00474-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 01-14-00474-CV

12-30-2014

GARY JOHNSON, Appellant v. PRIME AUTO DIRECT, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1028833

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Gary Johnson, has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss his appeal because the parties have entered into a settlement agreement, but he does not indicate any agreement as to costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (d). Though this motion was filed electronically, the certificate of service states that all parties were served via regular mail. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(b)(1). Also, though there is no certificate of conference, this motion has been on file with the Court for more than 10 days and no party has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Prime Auto Direct

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Dec 30, 2014
NO. 01-14-00474-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2014)
Case details for

Johnson v. Prime Auto Direct

Case Details

Full title:GARY JOHNSON, Appellant v. PRIME AUTO DIRECT, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Dec 30, 2014

Citations

NO. 01-14-00474-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 30, 2014)