From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Prator

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Aug 7, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-1626-P (W.D. La. Aug. 7, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-1626-P

08-07-2020

PATRICK JOHNSON v. STEVE PRATOR, ET AL.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack of written objections filed by Plaintiff, and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, at Shreveport, Louisiana, on this 7th day of August, 2020.

/s/ _________

CHIEF JUDGE S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Johnson v. Prator

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Aug 7, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-1626-P (W.D. La. Aug. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Johnson v. Prator

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK JOHNSON v. STEVE PRATOR, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Aug 7, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-1626-P (W.D. La. Aug. 7, 2020)