From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Port City

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 8, 2009
333 F. App'x 145 (8th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-2847.

Submitted: October 5, 2009.

Filed: October 8, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

John Kearney, argued, Pine Bluff, AR, for Appellant.

Spencer F. Robinson, Ramsay Bridg-forth, argued, Pine Bluff, AR, for Appellee.

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


David Johnson appeals following the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action and the court's ensuing denial of his motion for reconsideration. After careful de novo review, see Davis v. KARK-TV, Inc., 421 F.3d 699, 703 (8th Cir. 2005), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court; and we also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration, see McAninch v. Wintermute, 491 F.3d 759, 775 (8th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Port City

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 8, 2009
333 F. App'x 145 (8th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Johnson v. Port City

Case Details

Full title:David JOHNSON, Appellant, v. PORT CITY JANITORS' SUPPLY PAPER COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 8, 2009

Citations

333 F. App'x 145 (8th Cir. 2009)