From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Plant

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 19, 1944
181 S.W.2d 240 (Ark. 1944)

Opinion

No. 4-7411

Opinion delivered June 19, 1944.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR. — The order of the chancellor retransferring the cause to the circuit court was not a judgment from which an appeal could be taken. 2. APPEAL AND ERROR. — An appeal prematurely brought will be dismissed for that reason.

Appeal from Pulaski Chancery Court; Frank H. Dodge, Chancellor; appeal dismissed.

Fred A. Snodgress, for appellant.

A. L. Rotenberry, for appellee.


Plant brought a suit in ejectment against Johnson to recover possession of a lot in the city of Little Rock. He alleged a title based upon a tax sale to the state, which had been confirmed at the suit of the State.

Lenon, who had conveyed the lot to Johnson, filed an intervention for the purpose of defending the title which he had conveyed. In his intervention Lenon prayed that the cause be transferred to chancery, and that motion was sustained. Upon motion of Plant the cause was transferred back to the circuit court, and from that order is this appeal.

The appeal is premature and must be dismissed for that reason. It was held in the case of Womack v. Connor, 74 Ark. 352, 85 S.W. 783, to quote the headnote, that: "An order transferring a cause from the chancery to the circuit court is not a judgment from which an appeal may be taken."

The appeal must, therefore, be dismissed as having been prematurely taken, and it is so ordered.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Plant

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jun 19, 1944
181 S.W.2d 240 (Ark. 1944)
Case details for

Johnson v. Plant

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSON v. PLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 19, 1944

Citations

181 S.W.2d 240 (Ark. 1944)
181 S.W.2d 240

Citing Cases

Plant v. Johnson

McFADDIN, J. The first appeal in this case was dismissed as premature. Johnson v. Plant, 207 Ark. 871, 181…

Contr. Tire Supp. v. Tires, Tubes, Wheels

[A]n order transferring a cause from circuit to chancery . . . is not appealable, even though it affects a…