From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Pizante

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
2:11-cv-1870-GEB-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

2:11-cv-1870-GEB-EFB

10-06-2011

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. REGINA PICCOLO PIZANTE; JOHN PICCOLO; BONNIE VIRGINIA CASTLEMAN; JOELLA MARIE BAKER; JOSEPH PICCOLO JR., Defendants.


ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P.

4(M) NOTICE

Plaintiff's Status Report filed October 3, 2011 reveals this case is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on October 17, 2011 is continued to December 12, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior.

Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that any defendant not served with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may be dismissed as a defendant. To avoid dismissal, Plaintiff shall file proof of service or explain in a filing "good cause for the failure" to serve within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed period no later than 4:00 p.m. on November 14, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Pizante

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 6, 2011
2:11-cv-1870-GEB-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Johnson v. Pizante

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. REGINA PICCOLO PIZANTE; JOHN PICCOLO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

2:11-cv-1870-GEB-EFB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2011)