From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Pineda

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 22, 2010
935 N.E.2d 38 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-1116.

Submitted September 15, 2010.

Decided September 22, 2010.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hocking County, No. 10CA1.

John A. Johnson, pro se.

Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Diane Mallory, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, John A. Johnson, for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Johnson from filing a successive habeas corpus petition insofar as he raises claims that he either raised or could have raised in his previous petitions. Keith v. Kelley, 125 Ohio St.3d 161, 2010-Ohio-1807, 926 N.E.2d 646, ¶ 1; State ex rel. Johnson v. Hudson, 118 Ohio St.3d 308, 2008-Ohio-2451, 888 N.E.2d 1090; Johnson v. Mitchell (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 123, 707 N.E.2d 471. Res judicata "is applicable to successive habeas corpus petitions because habeas corpus petitioners have the right to appeal adverse judgments in habeas corpus cases." State ex rel. Childs v. Lazaroff (2001), 90 Ohio St.3d 519, 520, 739 N.E.2d 802; see generally McCleskey v. Zant (1991), 499 U.S. 467, 479-89, 111 S.Ct. 1454, 113 L.Ed.2d 517.

Judgment affirmed.

BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR, O'DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Pineda

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 22, 2010
935 N.E.2d 38 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. Pineda

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. JOHNSON, APPELLANT, v. PINEDA, WARDEN, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 22, 2010

Citations

935 N.E.2d 38 (Ohio 2010)
935 N.E.2d 38
2010 Ohio 4387

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Bradshaw

Keith v. Kelley, 125 Ohio St.3d 161, 2010-Ohio-1807, 926 N.E.2d 646, ¶ 1; State ex rel. Johnson v. Hudson,…

Nedea v. Cook

{¶12} Second, res judicata bars Nedea from filing a successive habeas corpus petition insofar as he raises…