From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Pfizer, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Dec 13, 2005
C.A. No. 2:05-2178 LKK DAD (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2005)

Opinion

C.A. No. 2:05-2178 LKK DAD.

December 13, 2005


Enclosed is a certified copy of the order from the Judicial panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferring the above entitled action to the Northern District of California, San Francisco Division. The case has been assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer for coordinated or consolidated pretrial processing pursuant to 28 USC § 1407.

Please forward the original record and a certified copy of the docket entries in the case listed above along with the enclosed copy of this transmittal letter to:

United States District Court Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue, P.O. Box 36060 San Francisco, CA 94102 Attn: Rufino Santos

If the case is an electronic case filing, please provide us with a temporary log in and a password to directly access your database and to expedite the downloading of the PDF files of prior postings. We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter.

DOCKET NO. 1699 JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-6) On September 6, 2005, the Panel transferred 30 civil actions to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. Since that time, 121 additional actions have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer.

It appears that the actions on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact which are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Breyer.

Pursuant to Rule 7.4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 199 F.R.D. 425, 435-36 (2001), these actions are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of September 6, 2005, ___ F. Supp. 2d ___ (J.P.M.L. 2005), and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer.

This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed fifteen (15) days from the entry thereof and if any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this fifteen (15) day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Pfizer, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California
Dec 13, 2005
C.A. No. 2:05-2178 LKK DAD (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2005)
Case details for

Johnson v. Pfizer, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Frank Johnson v. Pfizer, Inc., et al

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Dec 13, 2005

Citations

C.A. No. 2:05-2178 LKK DAD (N.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2005)