From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Patterson Fuel Associates, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 28, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1113 JAM EFB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1113 JAM EFB.

April 28, 2011


ORDER


This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) for hearing on plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment against defendant Patterson Fuel Associates, LLC dba HB Food Fuel. On April 27, 2011, a hearing on the motion was held. Plaintiff Scott Johnson, an attorney, appeared at the hearing and represented himself. Linh Huynh appeared pro se on behalf of defendant.

At the hearing, after the undersigned expressed concerns regarding the adequacy of service of process, plaintiff withdrew the motion for default judgment. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for default judgment, Dckt. No. 10, is denied. Additionally, at the hearing, plaintiff requested additional time to serve defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The undersigned found that good cause supported an extension of time for service under Rule 4(m) and therefore granted the request.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Patterson Fuel Associates, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 28, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1113 JAM EFB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Johnson v. Patterson Fuel Associates, LLC

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. PATTERSON FUEL ASSOCIATES, LLC, dba HB…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 28, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1113 JAM EFB (E.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2011)