From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Patel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
2:11-cv-001059-GEB-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

2:11-cv-001059-GEB-EFB

08-02-2011

Scott N. Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Babu T. Patel, Defendant.


ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

CONFERENCE

Plaintiff states in his Status Report filed August 1, 2011, that he "has filed a Request for Clerk's Entry of Default and anticipates a Motion for Default date in October 2011." (ECF No. 9, 3:12-13.)

Plaintiff shall file a motion for entry of default judgment before the Magistrate Judge within forty-five (45) days of the date on which this Order is filed. If Plaintiff fails to timely file the motion, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing no later than 4:00 p.m. on September 30, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed for failure of prosecution.

Further, the status conference scheduled for hearing on August 15, 2011, is continued to commence at 9:00 a.m. on January 30, 2012. A status report shall be filed fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference in which Plaintiff is required to explain the status of the default proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

GARLAND E.BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Patel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 2, 2011
2:11-cv-001059-GEB-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Johnson v. Patel

Case Details

Full title:Scott N. Johnson, Plaintiff, v. Babu T. Patel, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

2:11-cv-001059-GEB-EFB (E.D. Cal. Aug. 2, 2011)