From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Oregon State Parole Board

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 8, 2008
Civ. No. 07-153-CL (D. Or. Apr. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Civ. No. 07-153-CL.

April 8, 2008


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed Findings and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Clarke.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (#28) is adopted. Petitioner's amended petition (#7) is denied and this action is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Oregon State Parole Board

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Apr 8, 2008
Civ. No. 07-153-CL (D. Or. Apr. 8, 2008)
Case details for

Johnson v. Oregon State Parole Board

Case Details

Full title:GORDON JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PAROLE BOARD, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Apr 8, 2008

Citations

Civ. No. 07-153-CL (D. Or. Apr. 8, 2008)

Citing Cases

Ross v. Schriro

The Court will deny the motions to reopen the federal habeas petitions. See Cherry, 2008 WL 4238912, at *6…