Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01359-WJM-KLM
04-18-2013
MINUTE ORDER
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend his First Amended Complaint to Include RICO Violations Pursuant to U.S.C. 1961 [sic] and to Add the Following Defendants: Denver Red Lion Hotel Southeast, Kelly Barrett, Sage Porter [Docket No. 45; Filed October 17, 2012] (the "Motion to Amend") and Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate State Claims of Civil Theft, et al, in Boulder District Court With Its [sic] Fedeal [sic] Claims of Copyright Infringement and Racketeering [Docket No. 44; Filed October 17, 2012) (the "Motion to Consolidate").
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Amend [#45] is DENIED without prejudice. If Plaintiff, who proceeds in this matter pro se, is seeking leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, he must file a motion which complies with the federal and local rules, namely, Fed. R. Civ. P. 15, and which includes the proposed Second Amended Complaint as a document separate from the motion. The Court will not permit piecemeal adjudication of Plaintiff's case, thus Plaintiff must include all claims he seeks to bring and defendants he intends to name in the proposed Second Amended Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Consolidate [#44] is DENIED. Plaintiff seeks to consolidate this action with a state court case filed in the District Court for Boulder County, Colorado. Motion to Consolidate [#44] at 2. Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 permits consolidation of actions pending before the same court or before two different federal courts within the same federal judicial district. Investors Research Co. v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the Cent. Dist. of Cal., 877 F.2d 777 (9th Cir. 1989). It does not permit consolidation of a state court case with a federal case.