From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 26, 2007
244 F. App'x 554 (5th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-60123, Summary Calendar.

June 26, 2007.

Thomas Johnson, Parchman, MS, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, USDC No. 4:05-CV-250.

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.


Thomas Johnson, Mississippi prisoner # K6003, appeals the district court's sua sponte dismissal of his in forma pauperis civil rights complaint on the ground that he failed to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Johnson asserted in his complaint that he was prevented from exhausting the Administrative Remedy Program steps by prison officials' failure to pick up his Step 2 grievance in a timely fashion. In dismissing the complaint for failure to exhaust, the district court relied on Johnson's assertion that his administrative appeal was denied as untimely without considering Johnson's stated reasons for such denial.

The Supreme Court recently held "that failure to exhaust is an affirmative defense under the [Prison Litigation Reform Act], and that inmates are not required to specifically plead or demonstrate exhaustion in their complaints." Jones v. Bock, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 910, 921, 166 L.Ed.2d 798 (2007). Accordingly, the district court's judgment is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 26, 2007
244 F. App'x 554 (5th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. Mississippi Dept. of Corr

Case Details

Full title:Thomas JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 26, 2007

Citations

244 F. App'x 554 (5th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Valenti

Failure to exhaust is an affirmative defense in a prisoner civil rights suit; prisoners are "not required to…

Williams v. Certain Individual Employees of TDCJ

Failure to exhaust is an affirmative defense in a prisoner civil rights action, but state prisoners are "not…