From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Mikula

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 12, 2022
3:21-cv-05927-WHO (N.D. Cal. May. 12, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-05927-WHO

05-12-2022

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. LORETTA BURCHER MIKULA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement in principle.

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Mikula

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 12, 2022
3:21-cv-05927-WHO (N.D. Cal. May. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Mikula

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. LORETTA BURCHER MIKULA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 12, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-05927-WHO (N.D. Cal. May. 12, 2022)