From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. McGinley

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jun 22, 2021
Civil Action 1:18-CV-2359 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 22, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:18-CV-2359

06-22-2021

ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY, PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents


ORDER

Christopher C. Conner United States District Judge

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2021, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

2. Petitioner's request (Doc. 38) for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).


Summaries of

Johnson v. McGinley

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jun 22, 2021
Civil Action 1:18-CV-2359 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Johnson v. McGinley

Case Details

Full title:ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT THOMAS MCGINLEY, PA…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 22, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 1:18-CV-2359 (M.D. Pa. Jun. 22, 2021)