From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Marianetti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 1994
202 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 11, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ontario County, Harvey, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant Marianetti's motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the three-year Statute of Limitations. Plaintiff alleges that Marianetti negligently altered a drainage pipe while constructing a house on the property adjacent to plaintiff's property in 1984, thereby causing ground water to be diverted onto plaintiff's property. Plaintiff alleges that the cause of action accrued in 1992 when she discovered that the basement wall of her home had cracked and showed signs of collapse. "The general rule * * * is that an action for injury to * * * property accrues at the time the injury is sustained, notwithstanding the actual damage is not suffered until later" (75 N.Y. Jur 2d, Limitations and Laches, § 195).

In certain construction cases, the cause of action has been held to accrue after construction, when the injury is sustained (see, Mark v. Eshkar, 194 A.D.2d 356, 357 [structural damage to a building from the loss of lateral support]; Durant v. Grange Silo Co., 12 A.D.2d 694 [collapse of a structure]). In this case, however, the "injury" occurred when Marianetti altered the drainage pipe causing water to flow onto plaintiff's property (see, City of Niagara Falls v. Rudolph, 97 A.D.2d 971). Accordingly, plaintiff's claim against Marianetti was barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff's complaint against defendant City of Canandaigua as time-barred because "the happening of the event upon which the claim [was] based" (General Municipal Law § 50-i) was the alleged negligent inspection by the City in 1984 (see, Klein v. City of Yonkers, 53 N.Y.2d 1011; Nebbia v. County of Monroe, 92 A.D.2d 724, lv denied 59 N.Y.2d 603).

Thus, the order is modified by granting Marianetti's motion to dismiss the complaint.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Marianetti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 11, 1994
202 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Johnson v. Marianetti

Case Details

Full title:NANCY B. JOHNSON, Respondent-Appellant, v. MARTIN MARIANETTI, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 970 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 494

Citing Cases

Witt v. Merrill

Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order granting her motion for leave to reargue and, upon reargument,…

Vitale v. SP 26 Dev. Assoc. LLC

(See Mark v Eshkar, 194 AD2d 356, 357 [1stDept 1993] [cause of action for damage to party wall accrued not at…