From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Lozano

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 7, 2022
2:19-cv-1128 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-1128 MCE DB P

10-07-2022

ANTOINE L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JARED LOZANO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner who was proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 31.) On February 24, 2021, this case was dismissed on plaintiff's request pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (ECF No. 24.) The court confirmed that this case was dismissed by plaintiff and the case was closed on March 24, 2021. (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff's present filing (ECF No. 31) does not appear to be the one contemplated by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 31) be disregarded as this action is closed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Lozano

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 7, 2022
2:19-cv-1128 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Lozano

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINE L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JARED LOZANO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 7, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-1128 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2022)