From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Lopina

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 18, 2021
20-cv-08455-WHO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-08455-WHO

08-18-2021

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JUDITH JAY LOPINA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The parties to the action, by and through their counsel, have advised the Court that they have agreed to a settlement.

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and any hearings scheduled in this matter are VACATED. It is further ordered that if any party certifies to this Court, with proper notice to opposing counsel within ninety (90) days from the date below, that settlement has not in fact occurred, this order shall be vacated and this cause shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Lopina

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 18, 2021
20-cv-08455-WHO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2021)
Case details for

Johnson v. Lopina

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JUDITH JAY LOPINA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 18, 2021

Citations

20-cv-08455-WHO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2021)