From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Lewis

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 30, 2007
1:03-cv-05866-LJO-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2007)

Opinion

1:03-cv-05866-LJO-DLB-P.

November 30, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 17) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION


Plaintiff, Andre Johnson ("plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72-302.

On October 3, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days. To date, the parties have not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 73-305, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 3, 2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and,

2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a section 1983 claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Lewis

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 30, 2007
1:03-cv-05866-LJO-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. GAIL LEWIS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 30, 2007

Citations

1:03-cv-05866-LJO-DLB-P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2007)