From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Kling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 2008
48 A.D.3d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-03079.

February 19, 2008.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pines, J.), dated February 7, 2007, which granted the motion of the defendants GMAC Leasing Corp., General Motors Acceptance Corp., and Vaul Trust Corp. to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), on the ground that the action insofar as asserted against them is barred by 49 USC § 30106. Application by the plaintiff for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, in the event that the order is affirmed.

Schwartzapfel Truhowsky Marcus Sachs, P.C. (Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, N.Y., of counsel), for appellant.

Bivona Cohen, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Joseph V. Figliolo and Anthony J. McNulty of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Skelos, J.P., Fisher, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ. [ See 14 Misc 3d 1229(A), 2007 NY Slip Op 50210(U).]


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiffs application for leave to appeal this decision and order to the Court of Appeals is granted, and the following question is certified to the Court of Appeals: Was the decision and order of this Court properly made?

The Supreme Court correctly determined that 49 USC § 30106 bars this action insofar as asserted against the respondents ( see Jones v Bill, 34 AD3d 741, lv granted in part and dismissed in part 9 NY3d 954).


Summaries of

Johnson v. Kling

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 2008
48 A.D.3d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Johnson v. Kling

Case Details

Full title:CHEVONNA JOHNSON, Appellant, v. SUSAN KLING et al., Defendants, and GMAC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 19, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1505
854 N.Y.S.2d 648

Citing Cases

LUMA v. ELRAC, Inc.

On the other hand, vicarious liability is not abrogated where injury or damage results from the negligence of…

Lexington Insurance Co. v. GK Taxi Inc.

First, by the Application of the Supremacy Clause of Article IV of the United States Constitution (U.S.C.A.…