From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Kemper Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Apr 7, 1994
873 S.W.2d 279 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 64223.

March 8, 1994. Rehearing Denied April 7, 1994.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; RICHARD COPELAND, JUDGE.

Carl and Carol Johnson pro se.

Michael P. Corrigan, Wuestling, James DeVoto, St. Louis, for defendants/respondents.

Before GRIMM, P.J., and SMITH and AHRENS, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment in a court-tried case denying them recovery for termite damage under their homeowner's policy. No error of law appears, the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a statement setting forth the basis of our decision.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Johnson v. Kemper Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Apr 7, 1994
873 S.W.2d 279 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Johnson v. Kemper Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CARL AND CAROL JOHNSON, PLAINTIFFS/APPELLANTS, v. KEMPER CORPORATION…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Apr 7, 1994

Citations

873 S.W.2d 279 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)