From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Keller

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Aug 17, 2010
1:10CV373 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2010)

Opinion

1:10CV373.

August 17, 2010


ORDER


On July 8, 2010, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed, and notice was served on the parties in this action. Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Petitioner objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 10.)

The court has reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination, which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds (Doc. 4) be GRANTED, and the petition be DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Keller

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Aug 17, 2010
1:10CV373 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Johnson v. Keller

Case Details

Full title:FLINT FITZGERALD JOHNSON, JR., Petitioner, pro se, v. ALLEN W. KELLER…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Aug 17, 2010

Citations

1:10CV373 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 17, 2010)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Perry

The district court correctly found that Johnson had a prior § 2254 petition dismissed with prejudice. See…