Opinion
284 CAF 20-01185
03-26-2021
D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. SCOTT A. OTIS, WATERTOWN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
PAUL B. WATKINS, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
SCOTT A. OTIS, WATERTOWN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (Peter A. Schwerzmann, A.J.), entered August 5, 2020 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the motion of petitioner-respondent to reconstruct trial testimony.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Johnson v Johnson ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Mar. 26, 2021] [4th Dept 2021]).
Entered: March 26, 2021
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court