April, 1915.
Judgment modified by striking out this provision, "together with an extra allowance of fifty ($50) dollars for counsel fee," and as thus modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Burr, Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.
Full title:Kate Q. Johnson, Respondent, v. James F. Johnson, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Apr 1, 1915
This explanation, which presumes that the pedestrian has a duty to maintain a lookout, is seemingly in…
Kazan v. KennedyPlaintiff asserts - and the Court agrees -- that the tension between a pedestrian's crosswalk right-of-way…