From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Johnson

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jul 1, 1933
133 Cal.App. 151 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)

Opinion

Docket No. 673.

July 1, 1933.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County vacating levy of execution and quashing writ. Benjamin F. Warmer, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Margaret B. Connell and Halverson Halverson for Appellant.

Theo. G. Krumm for Respondent.


[1] This is an appeal from an order vacating the levy of an execution and quashing the writ. The record presented is most deficient. There is no judgment-roll, reporter's transcript, nor bill of exceptions. The record consists of copies of the order appealed from and the notice of appeal and various orders, minute orders and affidavits. The clerk certified that they were true and correct copies of the originals on file in his office. There is no certificate of the judge contained in the record. In cases of this kind counsel should have a bill of exceptions settled.

As the record before us is not authenticated in the manner required by law and is totally deficient, we cannot consider it. (Sec. 951, Code Civ. Proc.; Guyot v. Cassab, 118 Cal.App. 742 [ 5 P.2d 912]; Salinas v. Riverside Finance Co., 126 Cal.App. 675 [ 14 P.2d 1025].)

Order affirmed.

Barnard, P.J., concurred.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Johnson

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Jul 1, 1933
133 Cal.App. 151 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
Case details for

Johnson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:MABEL E. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. DERWOOD V. JOHNSON, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 1, 1933

Citations

133 Cal.App. 151 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933)
23 P.2d 780

Citing Cases

San Bernardino Etc. Bank v. Adams

Under similar circumstances we have held that there is no sufficient record to permit us to review the order.…

Davison v. Gentry

It is manifest that no attempt was made to comply with Rule XXIX of the Rules for the Supreme Court and…