From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 28, 2017
397 P.3d 120 (Wash. 2017)

Opinion

No. 93901-2

06-28-2017

Cory N. JOHNSON, Respondent, and Andrea R. JOHNSON, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered this matter at its June 27, 2017, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petitioner's motion for discretionary review is denied and all other motions, including the motion for permission to amend a prior filing, are also denied. The request for accommodation is denied because the Petitioner has not demonstrated that providing her with counsel at public expense is a reasonable accommodation. The retort suggests that the Petitioner is able to submit timely filings that are of typical quality for a pro se litigant without disabilities. The Petitioner has not shown that her disabilities restrict her access to the courts, and therefore she is not entitled to appointed counsel as an accommodation.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 28, 2017
397 P.3d 120 (Wash. 2017)
Case details for

Johnson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:Cory N. JOHNSON, Respondent, and Andrea R. JOHNSON, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jun 28, 2017

Citations

397 P.3d 120 (Wash. 2017)