From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1955
285 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion

February 21, 1955.


In an action for a separation, order granting plaintiff's motion for examination of defendant modified by changing "January 1, 1949", to "January 1, 1951", in each item, and as so modified order affirmed, without costs; examination to proceed on ten days' notice. In view of the nature of defendant's limited opposition to the action, and the fact that there are minor children (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1170-a), an examination of defendant restricted to his financial condition could properly be granted. ( Goshin v. Goshin, 281 App. Div. 979.) However, nothing in the record warrants an examination as to finances prior to January 1, 1951. Wenzel, Acting P.J., MacCrate, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 21, 1955
285 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Johnson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:EMMA H. JOHNSON, Respondent, v. BOINE T. JOHNSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 21, 1955

Citations

285 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Citing Cases

Kirshner v. Kirshner

Appellant, nevertheless, must satisfactorily prove adultery (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1150). We have heretofore…