From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. James

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 22, 2007
Case No. 3:05-cv-307-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:05-cv-307-KRG-KAP.

February 22, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

On January 30, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation, docket no. 32, recommending that the defendant's motion to dismiss, docket no. 30, be granted and the complaint be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

After review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and noting the absence of objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2007, it is

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss, docket no. 30, is granted, and the complaint is dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the Opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Johnson v. James

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 22, 2007
Case No. 3:05-cv-307-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2007)
Case details for

Johnson v. James

Case Details

Full title:DARNELL LEE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS L. JAMES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 22, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:05-cv-307-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2007)