From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Imperial

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 19, 2022
No. 22-1733 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 2022)

Opinion

22-1733

12-19-2022

ROBERT W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARIA L. IMPERIAL; GEICO CORPORATION; STEVEN L. MAURER; MAURER CHIROPRACTIC; JACLYN DAVIS; GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY; LARISSA DALLARI; WADE STROBLE; WILKES-BARRE IMAGING, LLC; WILKES-BARRE IMAGING; VISION IMAGING OF KINGSTON, LLC; FORD EXPLORER; DR. PAMELA THOMPSON; NORTHERN LIGHTS CHIROPRACTIC; GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY; GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY; GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY; GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY; GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE COMPANY; GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY; CASSANDRA JONES; GEICO SPECIAL INVESTIGATORS; DAVIDSON AUTO GROUP; NEW JERSEY FAMILY AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE POLICY; CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION; CARFAX; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; EXEM UNITED, LLC, Defendants - Appellees.

Robert W. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: December 15, 2022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Rossie David Alston, Jr., District Judge. (1:22-cv-00078-RDA-TCB)

Robert W. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert W. Johnson appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint without prejudice. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Johnson's informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court's disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court's order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) ("The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief."). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Imperial

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 19, 2022
No. 22-1733 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Imperial

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARIA L. IMPERIAL; GEICO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 19, 2022

Citations

No. 22-1733 (4th Cir. Dec. 19, 2022)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Ponticello

Johnson v. Imperial, et al., C/A No. 1:22-cv-00078-RDA-TCB, at doc. 7 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2022) (dismissing…