From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Howard

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 26, 2006
Case No. 1:96-CV-662 (W.D. Mich. Jul. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:96-CV-662.

July 26, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff Richard L. Johnson, acting pro se, has filed a letter motion requesting that the Court reconsider earlier Orders denying requests by Johnson for miscellaneous relief against his former attorney and the Receiver. Plaintiff earlier appealed such Orders by Notice of Appeal filed on April 20, 2006. Given the filing of the Notice of Appeal, the Court lacks jurisdiction to grant reconsideration and/or relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. Post v. Bradshaw, 422 F.3d 419, 421-22 (6th Cir. 2005). However, the Court retains the ability to inform the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals whether it is inclined to grant such relief should the Court of Appeals remand for the purpose of such relief. See Id; First Nat'l Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Hirsch, 535 F.2d 343, 346 (6th Cir. 1976). Given this context, the Court interprets Plaintiff's letter motion as a request for relief under the Hirsch procedures.

So interpreted, the letter motion is denied. The Court has already denied multiple motions seeking the same relief. Plaintiff's previous voluntary payment of monies to his attorney and the Receiver was legally proper and should not be disturbed. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Richard L. Johnson's letter Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. No. 451) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Howard

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 26, 2006
Case No. 1:96-CV-662 (W.D. Mich. Jul. 26, 2006)
Case details for

Johnson v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ERIC HOWARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 26, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:96-CV-662 (W.D. Mich. Jul. 26, 2006)