From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Horton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 22, 2016
14cv909 KG/WPL (D.N.M. Mar. 22, 2016)

Opinion

14cv909 KG/WPL

03-22-2016

THOMAS JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. VINCENT HORTON, Warden, and GARY K. KING, New Mexico Attorney General, Respondents.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition ("PFRD") filed February 17, 2016. (Doc. 19.) The parties were notified that objections were due within fourteen days of service of the PFRD and that if no objections were filed, no appellate review would be allowed. (See Doc. 19 at 18.) To this date, no objections have been filed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1) the PFRD (Doc. 19) is adopted as an order of the Court;

2) the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 1) is denied;

3) this cause is dismissed with prejudice; and

4) a certificate of appealability is denied.

/s/ _________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Horton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Mar 22, 2016
14cv909 KG/WPL (D.N.M. Mar. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Johnson v. Horton

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. VINCENT HORTON, Warden, and GARY K. KING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Mar 22, 2016

Citations

14cv909 KG/WPL (D.N.M. Mar. 22, 2016)