From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. HomeGoods, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 27, 2023
2:22-cv-01893-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01893-JCM-NJK

01-27-2023

STEPHANIE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. HOMEGOODS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

[DOCKET NO. 16]

Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge

Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulation to extend discovery deadlines. Docket No. 16. The parties seek a 60-day extension to the current discovery deadlines. Id. at 1. The parties submit that good cause exists to extend the discovery deadlines because they are hying to minimize discovery costs prior to a mediation. Id. at 2.

In the future, the parties must ensure that they use the correct case number on all filings.

The parties, in reality, seek a stay of discovery. However, they fail to address any of the relevant standards. See id at 1-2. To the extent the parties seek a stay of discovery, a request must be filed identifying the governing standards and providing meaningful discussion as to how they are met. See, e.g., Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013); Arik v. Meyers, 2020 WL 515843, at *1 (D. Nev. Jan. 31, 2020).

Accordingly, the parties' stipulation to extend discovery deadlines is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 16.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. HomeGoods, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 27, 2023
2:22-cv-01893-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Johnson v. HomeGoods, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STEPHANIE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. HOMEGOODS, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 27, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01893-JCM-NJK (D. Nev. Jan. 27, 2023)