From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Heinis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03135-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03135-BNB

01-10-2012

KEITH ALLEN JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERY HEINIS, # 06140, CHRIS CAMERON, # 87014, CHRISTOPHER BALES, # 06130, ROBERT GREASER, # 08034, ALEXANDER ST. PETER, # 05067, RICHARD HARVEY, JR., # 06069, LANCE GARDNER, # 95013, KEVIN DREYFUSS, # 99033, KEVIN UJCICH, # 06012, BRYON TOMPKINS, # 98029, LT. ARCHER, JOHN DOE (2), Denver Chief of Police, JOHN DOE (3), Denver Safety Manager, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, As Person, and JOHN RITTER, Governor of Colorado, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

The issue before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Defendants/Add Claims, Doc. No. 4, filed with the Court on January 9, 2012. Prior to a responsive pleading being served, a plaintiff may amend a complaint once as a matter of course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a). If Plaintiff desires to amend his Complaint he may do so without seeking permission of the Court. Therefore, the Motion is DENIED as unnecessary. An amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. See Balance v. Redman Homes, Inc., 759 F.2d 504, 508 (5th Cir. 1985); Cameron v. Figwort, 705 F.2d 676 (2d Cir.1983); London v. Coopers & Lybrand, 644 F.2d 811 (9th Cir. 1981); 6 C. Wright, A. Miller & M. Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1476 (1990).


Summaries of

Johnson v. Heinis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03135-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Heinis

Case Details

Full title:KEITH ALLEN JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERY HEINIS, # 06140, CHRIS CAMERON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03135-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 10, 2012)