From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Griffiths

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 21, 1955
131 N.E.2d 397 (Ohio 1955)

Opinion

Nos. 34626 and 34627

Decided December 21, 1955.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Township zoning resolution — Amendments — Constitutionality — Sections 3180-26 to 3180-36, inclusive, General Code — Procedural requirements — Due process — Equal protection of the laws.

APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County.

Mr. Andrew L. Johnson, for appellants.

Mr. Clyde W. Osborne, Jr., Messrs. Harrington, Huxley Smith, Mr. David E. Jones and Mr. Jay C. Brownlee, for appellees.


It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeals dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Griffiths

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 21, 1955
131 N.E.2d 397 (Ohio 1955)
Case details for

Johnson v. Griffiths

Case Details

Full title:JOHNSON ET AL., APPELLANTS v. GRIFFITHS ET AL., TRUSTEES, APPELLEES…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 21, 1955

Citations

131 N.E.2d 397 (Ohio 1955)
131 N.E.2d 397

Citing Cases

Bucholz v. City of Omaha

te rezoning action, but some of the recent decisions are to the contrary. The plaintiffs cite cases from New…

Black v. Mecca Twp. Bd. of Trustees

Furthermore, as appellees aptly note, not all procedural imperfections at the zoning commission level are…