From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Graber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Aug 31, 2012
No. CV 10-571-TUC-FRZ (CRP) (D. Ariz. Aug. 31, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV 10-571-TUC-FRZ (CRP)

08-31-2012

Matthew Johnson, Petitioner, v. Conrad M. Graber, Respondent.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle that recommends denying Petitioner's habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.

The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Pyle's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Pyle's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14) is accepted and adopted.

(2) Petitioner's §2241 habeas petition is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter.

__________________

Frank R. Zapata

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Johnson v. Graber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Aug 31, 2012
No. CV 10-571-TUC-FRZ (CRP) (D. Ariz. Aug. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Graber

Case Details

Full title:Matthew Johnson, Petitioner, v. Conrad M. Graber, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Aug 31, 2012

Citations

No. CV 10-571-TUC-FRZ (CRP) (D. Ariz. Aug. 31, 2012)