From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Gibbons

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jul 11, 2012
474 F. App'x 585 (9th Cir. 2012)

Summary

finding the district court properly dismissed Johnson's action because the deductions for room and board were effected by a valid act of the Nevada legislature, and the legislative process satisfies the requirements of procedural due process

Summary of this case from Adeyinka v. Norcor Corrs.

Opinion

No. 10-17530 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-00753-LRH-RAM

07-11-2012

TIMOTHY H. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JIM GIBBONS; et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding


Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

Timothy H. Johnson, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the deduction of room and board costs from his prison wages violated his due process rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Johnson's action because the deductions were effected by a valid act of the Nevada legislature, and the legislative process satisfies the requirements of procedural due process. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 209.461(1)(b) (deductions from prison wages, pursuant to Nev. Rev. Stat. § 209.463, is a condition of employment); Nev. Rev. Stat. § 209.463(1)(e) (authorizing deductions to "offset the cost of maintaining the offender in the institution"); Halverson v. Skagit County, 42 F.3d 1257, 1261 (9th Cir. 1994) ("[G]overnmental decisions which affect large areas and are not directed at one or a few individuals do not give rise to the constitutional procedural due process requirements of individual notice and hearing; general notice as provided by law is sufficient.").

Johnson's remaining contentions, including those regarding legislative intent, are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Gibbons

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jul 11, 2012
474 F. App'x 585 (9th Cir. 2012)

finding the district court properly dismissed Johnson's action because the deductions for room and board were effected by a valid act of the Nevada legislature, and the legislative process satisfies the requirements of procedural due process

Summary of this case from Adeyinka v. Norcor Corrs.
Case details for

Johnson v. Gibbons

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY H. JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JIM GIBBONS; et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jul 11, 2012

Citations

474 F. App'x 585 (9th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Adeyinka v. Norcor Corrs.

Moreover, deductions from an inmate's assets do not necessarily run afoul of the constitution. See Johnson…