From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

JOHNSON v. GHEE

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 28, 2005
Case No. 4:00CV1075 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 4:00CV1075.

October 28, 2005


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert. (Dkt. #34). The Magistrate Judge's report recommended that Defendant Margaret Ghee's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be granted and that Plaintiff Rogerico Johnson's Motion to Appoint Counsel be denied. (Dkt. #34).

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Therefore, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Limbert (Dkt. #34) is hereby ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

JOHNSON v. GHEE

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 28, 2005
Case No. 4:00CV1075 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2005)
Case details for

JOHNSON v. GHEE

Case Details

Full title:ROGERICO JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MARGARET GHEE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 28, 2005

Citations

Case No. 4:00CV1075 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 28, 2005)