From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Gedi

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 27, 2024
4:24-cv-152-JM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 27, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-152-JM

08-27-2024

KEONNA JOHNSON PLAINTIFF v. MUHYADIN GEDI and LOADEX LTD CO DEFENDANTS


ORDER

By order entered on July 23, 2024, Plaintiff was given until August 2, 2024 to fully respond to the interrogatories and requests for production of documents propounded on her in April. Pending is Defendant Loadex Ltd. Co.'s motion to dismiss based on Plaintiff's failure to respond as ordered. (doc. No. 14). To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the discovery or to the motion to dismiss. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED.

Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 37(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED,


Summaries of

Johnson v. Gedi

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Aug 27, 2024
4:24-cv-152-JM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Johnson v. Gedi

Case Details

Full title:KEONNA JOHNSON PLAINTIFF v. MUHYADIN GEDI and LOADEX LTD CO DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Aug 27, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-152-JM (E.D. Ark. Aug. 27, 2024)