From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Finney

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 17, 2022
22-cv-01102-SK (N.D. Cal. May. 17, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-01102-SK

05-17-2022

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. KAREN LEE FINNEY, et al., Defendants.


CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL REGARDING DOCKET NO. 16

SALLIE KIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff advises the Court that the parties have reached a settlement of this case and that Plaintiff expects to file a dismissal with prejudice within sixty days. (Dkt. No. 16.) All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Dkts. 8, 13.) Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Finney

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 17, 2022
22-cv-01102-SK (N.D. Cal. May. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Johnson v. Finney

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. KAREN LEE FINNEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 17, 2022

Citations

22-cv-01102-SK (N.D. Cal. May. 17, 2022)