Johnson v. Fields

Full title: SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DOROTHY FIELDS, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 1, 2011

CIV S-10-1021 JAM DAD (TEMP) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2011)

Opinion

SCOTT JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DOROTHY FIELDS, Defendant. No. CIV S-10-1021 JAM DAD (TEMP) United States District Court, E.D. California. April 1, 2011

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Presently calendared for hearing in the above-entitled action on May 6, 2011 is plaintiff's motion for default judgment. An amended complaint was filed which named Dorothy Fields as a defendant. In plaintiff's status report, plaintiff asserts this defendant was added because there was a change in ownership at the facility which is the subject of this action under the Americans With Disabilities Act. Although the amended complaint references ownership documents at Exhibit B to the amended complaint, nowhere in that exhibit nor in any other documentation submitted to the court is there any evidence that Dorothy Fields is a proper defendant in this action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. No later than April 15, 2011, plaintiff shall file a supplemental brief supporting plaintiff's claim that defendant Fields is the owner of the subject property.

         2. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on Dorothy Fields; 2901 Auburn Folsom Road; Newcastle, CA 95658.