Opinion
Civil Action No. 10-692.
March 14, 2011
ORDER
On May 20, 2010, the above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis accompanied by a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 635(b)(1), and the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21), filed on February 17, 2011, recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpu:: be denied. Petitioner was served with the Report and Recommendation and advised he was allou", ed to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation on or before March 7, 2011. No 01) jections have been filed. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2011;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.