From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. FBOP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jul 15, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-391 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 15, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-391

07-15-2019

KWHUN JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. FBOP, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Kwhun Johnson, an inmate formerly confined at USP Pollock, proceeding pro se, filed this Bivens-type action against the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this action be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) as plaintiff did not pay the initial partial filing fee as ordered.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

In his objections, plaintiff argued he sent proof that he was indigent and could not pay the initial partial filing fee of $21.67 as ordered. The original application to proceed in forma pauperis included a certified income trust statement which showed plaintiff's average deposit for the 6 month period was $108.33 (docket entry no. 13). Twenty percent of $108.33 is $21.67. Plaintiff provided no additional certified income trust statement showing his balance had changed. Regardless, on January 9, 2019, plaintiff notified the Court of an address change which showed he had been released from prison (docket entry no. 22). On May 16, 2019, this Court ordered plaintiff to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis for non-prisoners (docket entry no. 23). The Order also instructed the Clerk of Court to mail plaintiff a copy of the application. Despite ample time to do so, plaintiff has yet to file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis for non-prisoners.

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is PARTIALLY ADOPTED, to the extent it recommends dismissal. A Final Judgment will be entered in accordance with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

Signed this date

Jul 15, 2019

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).


Summaries of

Johnson v. FBOP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jul 15, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-391 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Johnson v. FBOP

Case Details

Full title:KWHUN JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. FBOP, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Jul 15, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-391 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 15, 2019)