From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Englander

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Oct 17, 2023
20-cv-398-SE-AJ (D.N.H. Oct. 17, 2023)

Opinion

20-cv-398-SE-AJ

10-17-2023

Jacob William Johnson v. Celia Englander et al.

Jacob William Johnson, pro se


Jacob William Johnson, pro se

ORDER

Samantha D. Elliott, United States District Judge

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated September 11, 2023 (doc. no. 103). For the reasons explained therein, defendant Tina Crissfulli's motion to dismiss (doc. no. 95) is denied.

“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quotation omitted); see United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Englander

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
Oct 17, 2023
20-cv-398-SE-AJ (D.N.H. Oct. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Johnson v. Englander

Case Details

Full title:Jacob William Johnson v. Celia Englander et al.

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: Oct 17, 2023

Citations

20-cv-398-SE-AJ (D.N.H. Oct. 17, 2023)