Opinion
Case No. 2:16-cv-00062-APG-NJK
12-06-2016
SAMMY JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR EMLING et al., Defendants.
ORDER
I. DISCUSSION
On July 5, 2016, this Court dismissed the case, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim and found that amendment would be futile. (ECF No. 6 at 6). On November 7, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for relief from retaliation. (ECF No. 11). In the motion, it appears that Plaintiff is alleging that he may be housed with a potentially violent inmate. (Id.)
The Court is having difficulty understanding Plaintiff's motion. (ECF No. 11). Plaintiff states that another inmate "killed" him on July 14, 2015. (Id. at 3). --------
The Court notes that this case is closed. If Plaintiff seeks to open a new lawsuit, he shall file a new application to proceed in forma pauperis and a new complaint with the Clerk of the Court. If Plaintiff believes he is in imminent danger, he may also submit a motion for temporary restraining order with his application to proceed in forma pauperis and complaint. Plaintiff shall file no more documents in this closed case. ///
II. CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the motion for relief from retaliation (ECF No. 11) is denied. Plaintiff shall file no more documents in this closed case.
It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff the approved form application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner, as well as the document entitled information and instructions for filing an in forma pauperis application.
It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall send to Plaintiff the approved form for filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and instructions for the same. The Clerk of the Court shall also send Plaintiff a copy of his motion for retaliation (ECF No. 11).
It is further ordered that Plaintiff may open a new case by submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a complaint to the Clerk of the Court.
DATED THIS 6th day of December 2016.
/s/_________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE