From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Eid

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1295 KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1295 KJM-KJN

01-06-2012

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID J. EID and SHERRY J. EID, Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff filed the complaint in the above-captioned action on May 13, 2011. (ECF 1.) Defendants were sub-served on May 31, 2011 after three attempts at personal service but have not yet appeared in this action (ECF 7); the clerk entered default on October 17, 2011 (ECF 11). Defendants were mailed the summons on November 2, 2011. (ECF 12.) This case has remained stagnant since then.

Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED, within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Eid

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 6, 2012
No. CIV S-11-1295 KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Eid

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT N. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID J. EID and SHERRY J. EID, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 6, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1295 KJM-KJN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2012)