From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Eckstrom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02052 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02052 EMC

10-18-2011

H. DEMETRIUS JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN ECKSTROM AND HAIGHT ASHBURY MEDICAL CLINICS, INC., Defendants.

LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP NICOLE A. BOLSON (SBN: 226733) DAVID A. LUCERO (SBN: 253300) Attorneys for Defendants JOHN ECKSTROM and HAIGHT ASHBURY MEDICAL CLINICS, INC.


LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

NICOLE A. BOLSON (SBN: 226733)

DAVID A. LUCERO (SBN: 253300)

Attorneys for Defendants

JOHN ECKSTROM and HAIGHT ASHBURY

MEDICAL CLINICS, INC.

[PROPOSED]ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM THE ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE

CONFERENCE


District Judge Edward Chen

Defendants JOHN ECKSTROM and HAIGHT ASHBURY MEDICAL CLINICS, INC., (collectively "Defendants") brought the instant Motion for Administrative Relief from the Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and for Continuance of the Conference ("Motion for Administrative Relief) pursuant to United States District Court Local Civil Rules 16-2(d) and 7-11, requesting that this Court continue the Initial Case Management Conference ("Initial CMC"), and issue an immediate determination on their Motion for Administrative Relief, without hearing, on the day after Plaintiff H. DEMETRIUS JOHNSON'S opposition is due, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7- 11(c).

After full consideration of the papers filed in support of and in opposition to Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief, and the documents on record herein, the Court rules as follows:

Good cause having been shown, Defendants' Motion for Administrative Relief is hereby GRANTED. This Court agrees that continuing the CMC and related obligations would promote more productive case management as well as judicial economy and efficiency. As such, the Court revises the Case Management Order as follows:

1. The Initial CMC is to be held on January 6, 2012;
2. The parties are to file a joint CMC statement by December 30, 2011; and
3. December 16, 2011 is to be the last day for the parties to:
• Meet and confer regarding initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection and discovery plan, pursuant to FRCP Rule 26(f) and ADR Local Rule 3-5;
• File ADR certification, pursuant to USDC Local Civil Rule 16-8(b) and ADR Local Rule 3-5(b); and
• File Stipulation to ADR Process, pursuant to USDC Local Civil Rule 16-8(c) and ADR Local Rule 3-5(b) and (c).
IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Eckstrom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02052 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Johnson v. Eckstrom

Case Details

Full title:H. DEMETRIUS JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN ECKSTROM AND HAIGHT ASHBURY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02052 EMC (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)