From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Dix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 3, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cv-159-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-159-KRG-KAP

12-03-2012

LARRY DALE JOHNSON, Petitioner v. WARDEN, F.C.I. FORT DIX, Respondent


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Petitioner's motion for reconsideration, docket no. 23, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with 28 U.S.C.S 636(b) and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on October 15, 2012, docket no. 25, recommending that the motion be denied. The parties were notified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1), that they had fourteen days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed timely objections, docket no. 26, that are meritless.

Upon de novo review of the record of this matter, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December 2012, it is

ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration, docket no. 23, is denied. The Clerk shall note petitioner's change of address.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:

Larry D. Johnson, Reg. No. 65400-065
c/o Tom Barrett
Solano County Public Defender's Office
675 Texas Street
Fairfield, CA 94533


Summaries of

Johnson v. Dix

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 3, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cv-159-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Johnson v. Dix

Case Details

Full title:LARRY DALE JOHNSON, Petitioner v. WARDEN, F.C.I. FORT DIX, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 3, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-159-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 3, 2012)