From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Dep't of the Navy

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 17, 2016
642 F. App'x 996 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Opinion

2015-3174

03-17-2016

LEE JOHNSON, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent

PETER BROIDA, Arlington, VA, argued for petitioner. SONIA MARIE ORFIELD, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD; TRACEY R. ROCKENBACH, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of the Navy, Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-1221-14-0828-W-1.

JUDGMENT

PETER BROIDA, Arlington, VA, argued for petitioner. SONIA MARIE ORFIELD, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD; TRACEY R. ROCKENBACH, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of the Navy, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 17, 2016

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Johnson v. Dep't of the Navy

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 17, 2016
642 F. App'x 996 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Johnson v. Dep't of the Navy

Case Details

Full title:LEE JOHNSON, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 17, 2016

Citations

642 F. App'x 996 (Fed. Cir. 2016)