From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Couturier

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 17, 2008
No. CIV S-05-2046 RRB KJM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-2046 RRB KJM.

January 17, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents came on regularly for hearing January 16, 2008. Gary Greenwald appeared for plaintiffs. Donald Sullivan appeared for defendant Couturier. No appearance was made for defendant Pensco, to whom the motion to compel is directed; Pensco's counsel Mary Jo Shartsis did participate in preparation of the parties' joint statement. No appearance was made for the remaining defendants. Upon careful review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel and having reviewed the authorities cited during argument, having reviewed the supplemental filing made by plaintiff following the hearing, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The motion to compel is granted. Responsive documents shall be produced within fifteen days. With respect to request no. 5, communications after June 8, 2006 may be withheld for the time being under the joint defense privilege; within fifteen days any documents withheld on that basis shall be submitted to the court for in camera review. Said submission shall be accompanied by a privilege log, which will be served on all parties.

2. The court finds an award of expenses is not warranted considering all of the circumstances reflected in the record before it on this motion. Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(a)(5)(A).


Summaries of

Johnson v. Couturier

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 17, 2008
No. CIV S-05-2046 RRB KJM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Johnson v. Couturier

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY JOHNSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CLAIR COUTURIER, JR., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 17, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-05-2046 RRB KJM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 17, 2008)