From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Manning

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Apr 20, 2016
No. 36 WM 2016 (Pa. Apr. 20, 2016)

Opinion

No. 36 WM 2016

04-20-2016

AARON SCOTT JOHNSON, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JUDGE MANNING, Respondent


ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2016, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (explaining that hyrbid representation is not permitted).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.


Summaries of

Johnson v. Manning

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Apr 20, 2016
No. 36 WM 2016 (Pa. Apr. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Johnson v. Manning

Case Details

Full title:AARON SCOTT JOHNSON, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 20, 2016

Citations

No. 36 WM 2016 (Pa. Apr. 20, 2016)